Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 leads 48.4 to 10.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for GPT-4 and 84% for Grok 4.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 48.1 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 12.4% | 45.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | 66.6% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | 28% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | 146.44 |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | 60.9 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 84% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1422 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | 87% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1415 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1283 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4 or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Grok 4 share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.