Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 18.4.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
GPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index29.141.8
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding12541396
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Granite 4.2 30b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts12411374
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math1269—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert12111406
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English12461340
LMArena Chinese12421414
LMArena Russian12511343
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following12411347

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query12441359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text12631361
LMArena Creative Writing12441288
LMArena Multi-Turn12571339
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper