Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 3 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 33.0 to 10.8.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
GPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index29.132.4
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding12541186
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12411145
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math12691152
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert12111142
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12461099
LMArena Chinese12421145
LMArena Russian12511092
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12411131

Long Context GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12441162

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text12631150
LMArena Creative Writing12441129
LMArena Multi-Turn12571108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper