Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs StarCoder 2 15B

GPT-4 Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#292); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 15B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 58.2% for GPT-4 Turbo and 38.4% for StarCoder 2 15B.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
GPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index30.538.1
Released2023-11-062024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked367

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%38.4%
HumanEval+86.6%37.8%
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
LMArena Coding1268—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, StarCoder 2 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25105
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
ForecastBench59.4—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LMArena Math1272—
MATH Level 546.7%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
MMLU81.3%64.1%
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1272—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1267—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than StarCoder 2 15B?

GPT-4 Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#292); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and StarCoder 2 15B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper