Model comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 28.5 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.7% for GPT-4 Turbo and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-06 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 18% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 4% |
| SimpleBench | 25.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LMCA | 9.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.4 | — |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | 52.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | 52.3% |
| Confabulations | 28.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| MMLU | 81.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1090 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1275 | — |
| LMArena German | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1194 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1267 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3-4B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.