Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen-14B

GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 9.0.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen-14B specifications
GPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.531.4
Released2023-11-062023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked3618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Coding12681071
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Qwen-14B leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts12511027
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25113.03
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
ForecastBench59.4—
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Math12721068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
MATH Level 546.7%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
MMLU81.3%66.3%
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English12451041
LMArena Chinese12421077
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following12491031

Long Context GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query12541028

Writing & Preference GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen-14B
LMArena Text12721051
LMArena Creative Writing12691028
LMArena Multi-Turn12671022

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-4 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen-14B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper