Model comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs Mixtral 8x7B
GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4 Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-4 Turbo leads 66.0 to 51.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.7% for GPT-4 Turbo and 10% for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
- GPT-4 Turbo accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 32K.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-06 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 32K |
| Max output | 4K | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1127 |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | 49.7% |
| WeirdML | 18% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: —, Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.7% | — |
Reasoning Mixtral 8x7B leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1115 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 49.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.25 | 118.38 |
| ForecastBench | 59.4 | 56.3 |
| SimpleBench | 25.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMCA | 9.8% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math Mixtral 8x7B leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1147 |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.7% | 10% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | 30.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1088 |
| MMLU | 81.3% | 70.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| Confabulations | 28.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104), Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1090 | — |
Multilingual GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1165 |
| LMArena German | 1259 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1194 | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 968 |
| LMArena Russian | 1259 | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | 1110 |
Instruction Following GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | 1110 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4 Turbo leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1267 | 1115 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Mixtral 8x7B?
GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 21× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4 Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Mixtral 8x7B?
Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.
Is GPT-4 Turbo or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
GPT-4 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4 Turbo does, with 128K tokens against 32K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Mixtral 8x7B share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.