Model comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 24.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.7% for GPT-4 Turbo and 71.1% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-06 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $30 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247), MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1470 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| WeirdML | 18% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311), MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 25.1% | 45.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1447 |
| DTBench | 61.6% | 78.9% |
| LMCA | 9.8% | 33.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.25 | 147 |
| ForecastBench | 59.4 | 61.4 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316), MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.7% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1462 |
| Confabulations | 28.4% | — |
| MMLU | 81.3% | — |
Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104), MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1090 | 1254 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211), MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1259 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1194 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1259 | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | 1431 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211), MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | 1433 |
Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201), MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1267 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 Turbo better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.
Is GPT-4 Turbo or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and MiniMax-M3 share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.