Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 13b

GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4 Turbo leads 47.7 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Llama 13b specifications
GPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index30.524.4
Released2023-11-062023-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked3621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Coding1268683
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1251728
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25100.58
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
ForecastBench59.4—
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math Llama 13b leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Math1272838
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
MATH Level 546.7%—
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
MMLU81.3%47.7%
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Vision1090—
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Non-English1245819
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1249781

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference GPT-4 Turbo leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboLlama 13b
LMArena Text1272834
LMArena Creative Writing1269794
LMArena Multi-Turn1267753

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Llama 13b?

GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Llama 13b better for coding?

GPT-4 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Llama 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper