Model comparison
GPT-4 Turbo vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 9.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 18% for GPT-4 Turbo and 42.8% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 41.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-06 | 2025-07-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.57 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $30 | $2.30 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 18% | 42.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1399 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 597.5 |
| HumanEval+ | 86.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.7% | 59.2% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 25.1% | 26.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1384 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.25 | 146.01 |
| ForecastBench | 59.4 | 60.2 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LMCA | 9.8% | — |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1397 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 28.4% | 20.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1365 |
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |
| MMLU | 81.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1090 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1276 | 1379 |
| LMArena German | 1259 | 1387 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1194 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1259 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | 1386 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1249 | 1348 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |
Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1254 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 Turbo | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1350 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1267 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1666 |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.
Is GPT-4 Turbo or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.