Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 9.0.
  • Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.75 / $2.25 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Hy4 preview specifications
GPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index30.545.3
Released2023-11-062026-08-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K64K
Input $ / M tokens$10$0.75
Output $ / M tokens$30$2.25
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena WebDev—1632
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
LMArena Coding1268—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Hy4 preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
SimpleBench25.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—

Math Hy4 preview leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
ProofBench—75%
LMArena Math1272—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Hy4 preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHy4 preview
LMArena Text1272—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1267—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $2.25 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper