Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.9 to 32.5.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderOpenAIArcee AI
Noometry Index37.238.6
Released2025-02-272026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—80K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked4224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Coding13961381
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Trinity Large Thinking leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Hard Prompts14031350
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
CritPt—0.9%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Math14121366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Expert13941360
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Trinity Large Thinking: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English14131325
LMArena Chinese14211373
LMArena French14181374
LMArena German14571356
LMArena Japanese14161311
LMArena Korean13921306
LMArena Russian14191337
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following14041334
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query14061355
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text14171340
LMArena Creative Writing13941320
LMArena Multi-Turn14441342
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper