Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

36.9

Rank #200 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 24.8 to 14.1.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
GPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index36.938.6
Released2025-02-27—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13971316
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14041299
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14121305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13941279
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14131290
LMArena Chinese14211331
LMArena Russian14191324
LMArena French1417—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14041287
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14061307
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14171321
LMArena Creative Writing13941328
LMArena Multi-Turn14441292
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper