Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Glimmer in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 13.9.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Muse Glimmer specifications
GPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index37.241.7
Released2025-02-272026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Coding13961416
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts14031396
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
CritPt—2.6%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14121417
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert13941386
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14131384
LMArena Chinese14211412
LMArena Russian14191390
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14041375
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14061382
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14171389
LMArena Creative Writing13941339
LMArena Multi-Turn14441399
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper