Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 32.5.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
GPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index37.243.0
Released2025-02-272026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding13961476
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1433
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—
ALE-Bench—785.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14031457
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math14121447
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert13941478
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual Too close to call

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English14131416
LMArena Chinese14211456
LMArena French14181469
LMArena German14571417
LMArena Japanese14161366
LMArena Korean13921400
LMArena Russian14191427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14041445
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14061455
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text14171436
LMArena Creative Writing13941415
LMArena Multi-Turn14441456
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper