Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 26.8 to 13.9.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
GPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index37.245.2
Released2025-02-272026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding13961503
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—
ALE-Bench—899.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14031488
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
CritPt—4%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
DTBench—84.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math14121481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
ProofBench—22%
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert13941503
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14131449
LMArena Chinese14211507
LMArena French14181488
LMArena German14571458
LMArena Japanese14161412
LMArena Korean13921437
LMArena Russian14191450
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14041477
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14061483
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14171465
LMArena Creative Writing13941440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing12581493
LMArena Multi-Turn14441477
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper