Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.9

Rank #219 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 22.3.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for GPT-4.1.
  • GPT-4.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 and Sonar specifications
GPT-4.1Sonar
ProviderOpenAIPerplexity
Noometry Index35.938.5
Released2025-04-142024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M128K
Max output33K4K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1
Output $ / M tokens$8$1
Results tracked527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#238), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
SWE-bench Verified48.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)39.6%—
Aider Polyglot52.4%—
WeirdML39%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1391—
CadEval42%—
ALE-Bench558.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 34.7 (#43), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard54%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#339), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
SimpleBench27%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
EnigmaEval2.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1384—
DTBench68.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA25.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.78—
ForecastBench61.5—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

GPT-4.1: 22.3 (#280), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 37.1 (#160), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
GPQA Diamond66.9%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
SimpleQA Verified31.1%—
MMLU-Pro81.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.6%—
GPQA (HELM)65.9%—
LMArena Expert1364—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 38.2 (#67), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 49.4 (#133), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
LMArena Non-English1370—
LMArena Chinese1382—
LMArena French1382—
LMArena German1381—
LMArena Japanese1319—
LMArena Korean1339—
LMArena Russian1377—
LMArena Spanish1376—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-4.1: 71.3 (#153), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
IFEval83.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1367—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#163), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1385—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 57.6 (#125), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Sonar
LMArena Text1383—
LMArena Creative Writing1363—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1420—
WildBench85.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1398—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 lists at $2 and $8.

Is GPT-4.1 or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper