Model comparison
GPT-4.1 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-4.1 leads 34.4 to 21.9.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 35.7 | 32.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $8 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GPT-4.1: 34.2 (#228), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 48.5% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 39.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 52.4% | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | — |
| CadEval | 42% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 558.1 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.1 leads
GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#40), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 54% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#334), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | — |
| DTBench | 68.3% | — |
| LMCA | 25.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.5 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 21.4 (#269), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 38.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1369 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 37.0 (#152), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 66.9% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 31.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1364 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 37.5 (#66), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1210 | — |
| GeoBench | 72% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 49.6 (#128), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena French | 1383 | — |
| LMArena German | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1375 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 71.5 (#148), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#158), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 63.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1385 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 57.8 (#120), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1363 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.