Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Laguna M.1

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.9

Rank #219 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Laguna M.1 leads 23.1 to 11.7.
  • GPT-4.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 and Laguna M.1 specifications
GPT-4.1Laguna M.1
ProviderOpenAIPoolside
Noometry Index35.932.5
Released2025-04-142026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output33K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$8—
Results tracked523

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Laguna M.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#238), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
SWE-bench Verified48.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)39.6%—
Aider Polyglot52.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1349
WeirdML39%—
LMArena Coding1391—
CadEval42%—
ALE-Bench558.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 34.7 (#43), Laguna M.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard54%—

Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#339), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
SimpleBench27%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
EnigmaEval2.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1384—
DTBench68.3%—
LMCA25.6%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index136.78—
ForecastBench61.5—

Math GPT-4.1 leads

GPT-4.1: 22.3 (#280), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 37.1 (#160), Laguna M.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
GPQA Diamond66.9%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
SimpleQA Verified31.1%—
MMLU-Pro81.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.6%—
GPQA (HELM)65.9%—
LMArena Expert1364—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 38.2 (#67), Laguna M.1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 49.4 (#133), Laguna M.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1370—
LMArena Chinese1382—
LMArena French1382—
LMArena German1381—
LMArena Japanese1319—
LMArena Korean1339—
LMArena Russian1377—
LMArena Spanish1376—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 71.3 (#153), Laguna M.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
IFEval83.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1367—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#163), Laguna M.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1385—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 57.6 (#125), Laguna M.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1Laguna M.1
LMArena Text1383—
LMArena Creative Writing1363—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1420—
WildBench85.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1398—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Laguna M.1?

GPT-4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Laguna M.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper