Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 OpenAI

35.9

Rank #219 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 22.3.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for GPT-4.1.
  • GPT-4.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1Hy3
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index35.944.2
Released2025-04-142026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output33K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.13
Output $ / M tokens$8$0.53
Results tracked5219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#238), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Coding13911464
SWE-bench Verified48.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)39.6%—
Aider Polyglot52.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1508
WeirdML39%—
CadEval42%—
ALE-Bench558.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 34.7 (#43), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard54%—

Reasoning Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#339), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Hard Prompts13841447
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
SimpleBench27%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
EnigmaEval2.2%—
DTBench68.3%—
LMCA25.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.78—
ForecastBench61.5—

Math Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 22.3 (#280), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Math13701475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202538.3%—
Omni-MATH47.1%—
MATH Level 583%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 37.1 (#160), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Expert13641460
GPQA Diamond66.9%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
SimpleQA Verified31.1%—
MMLU-Pro81.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.6%—
GPQA (HELM)65.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1: 38.2 (#67), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench72%—

Multilingual Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 49.4 (#133), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Non-English13701426
LMArena Chinese13821493
LMArena French13821461
LMArena German13811439
LMArena Japanese13191392
LMArena Korean13391395
LMArena Russian13771432
LMArena Spanish13761456

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 71.3 (#153), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Instruction Following13671426
IFEval83.8%—

Long Context Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#163), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Longer Query13851442
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1: 57.6 (#125), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1Hy3
LMArena Text13831439
LMArena Creative Writing13631402
LMArena Multi-Turn13981436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1420—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 lists at $2 and $8.

Is GPT-4.1 or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Hy3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper