Model comparison
GPT-4.1 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 23.9 to 11.7.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 35.7 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $8 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
GPT-4.1: 34.2 (#228), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1391 | 1270 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 48.5% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 39.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 52.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| CadEval | 42% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 558.1 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#40), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 54% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#334), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1264 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.2% | — |
| DTBench | 68.3% | — |
| LMCA | 25.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.5 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
GPT-4.1: 21.4 (#269), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1369 | 1274 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 38.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 47.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 leads
GPT-4.1: 37.0 (#152), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1364 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 66.9% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 31.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1: 37.5 (#66), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1210 | — |
| GeoBench | 72% | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 leads
GPT-4.1: 49.6 (#128), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1370 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1377 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1383 | — |
| LMArena German | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1375 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 leads
GPT-4.1: 71.5 (#148), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1245 |
| IFEval | 83.8% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#158), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1385 | 1301 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 63.9% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 leads
GPT-4.1: 57.8 (#120), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1383 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1363 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.