Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Yi-Large

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#322); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.7

Rank #322 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

37.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.1 to 23.8.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and Yi-Large specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Noometry Index27.737.6
Released2025-04-142024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked383

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-Large leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.7%
LMArena Coding1306—
BigCodeBench Complete—47.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LMArena Math1274—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1272—
MMLU—79.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Yi-Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
LMArena Non-English1260—
LMArena Chinese1270—
LMArena German1288—
LMArena Japanese1199—
LMArena Russian1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
IFEval84.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
Fiction.LiveBench25%—
LMArena Longer Query1283—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoYi-Large
LMArena Text1285—
LMArena Creative Writing1260—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Yi-Large?

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#322); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or Yi-Large better for coding?

Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Yi-Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper