Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs StarCoder 2 15B

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#327); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.9

Rank #327 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 15B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.6 to 24.1.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index27.938.1
Released2025-04-142024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked387

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—
LMArena Coding1306—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62105
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LMArena Math1274—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1272—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1260—
LMArena Chinese1270—
LMArena German1288—
LMArena Japanese1198—
LMArena Russian1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
IFEval84.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
Fiction.LiveBench25%—
LMArena Longer Query1283—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1285—
LMArena Creative Writing1260—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than StarCoder 2 15B?

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#327); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper