Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.9

Rank #327 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 21.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 28.9% for GPT-4.1 nano and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.945.3
Released2025-04-142026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$1.60
Results tracked3832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
SciCode25.9%45.5%
LMArena Coding13061473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
WeirdML19%—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
CritPt0%9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts12861460
DTBench52.5%84%
LMCA5.5%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62147.37
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-10%—
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%93.3%
LMArena Math12741466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
Omni-MATH36.7%—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond48.9%87.9%
LMArena Expert12721467
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision10631279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12601445
LMArena Chinese12701510
LMArena German12881471
LMArena Japanese11981413
LMArena Russian12611457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12671440
IFEval84.3%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12831455
Fiction.LiveBench25%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text12851455
LMArena Creative Writing12601439
LMArena Multi-Turn12771460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper