Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.7

Rank #322 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

32.8

Rank #241 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 1 category and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 23.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for GPT-4.1 nano and 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderOpenAIAmazon
Noometry Index27.732.8
Released2025-04-142025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked383

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode25.9%42.7%
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
WeirdML19%—
LMArena Coding1306—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt0%0%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LMArena Math1274—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1272—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1260—
LMArena Chinese1270—
LMArena German1288—
LMArena Japanese1199—
LMArena Russian1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
IFEval84.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Fiction.LiveBench25%—
LMArena Longer Query1283—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1285—
LMArena Creative Writing1260—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper