Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 5.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 24.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 6% for GPT-4.1 nano and 20% for Mistral Large 4.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
- Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.68 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $2.09 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1475 |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1541 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1444 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 27.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |
Math Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1488 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | 20% |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1447 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Mistral Large 4: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1415 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | 1491 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1414 |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1424 |
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | 1429 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1424 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 5.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Mistral Large 4?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Large 4 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.