Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Llama 2-34B

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#322); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.7

Rank #322 Confirmed

Llama 2-34B Meta

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 2-34B specifications
GPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index27.7—
Released2025-04-142023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.8 (#325), Llama 2-34B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—
LMArena Coding1306—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.3 (#98), Llama 2-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.6 (#344), Llama 2-34B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62104.81
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1286—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—44.1%
PIQA—81.9%
WinoGrande—76.7%

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 25.5 (#246), Llama 2-34B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
LMArena Math1274—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—
GSM8K—42.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#268), Llama 2-34B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—
LMArena Expert1272—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—54.5%
BoolQ—83.7%
MMLU—62.6%
OpenBookQA—58.2%
TriviaQA—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 28.6 (#108), Llama 2-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.8 (#200), Llama 2-34B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
LMArena Non-English1260—
LMArena Chinese1270—
LMArena German1288—
LMArena Japanese1199—
LMArena Russian1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 68.0 (#188), Llama 2-34B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
IFEval84.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#291), Llama 2-34B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
Fiction.LiveBench25%—
LMArena Longer Query1283—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.7 (#238), Llama 2-34B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 2-34B
LMArena Text1285—
LMArena Creative Writing1260—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Llama 2-34B?

GPT-4.1 nano has enough public results to be ranked (#322); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 2-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper