Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 10.8.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 47 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1347 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1299 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.