Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral 7B
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4.1 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral 7B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 34.7 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 87.3% for GPT-4.1 mini and 3.7% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
- GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
- Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 8K |
| Max output | 33K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 47 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1082 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.3% |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Mistral 7B leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1067 |
| DTBench | 68.8% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | 112.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1085 |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | 3.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1036 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1009 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1037 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 878 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1018 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | 1026 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1060 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1060 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1062 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Mistral 7B?
GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4.1 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Mistral 7B better for coding?
GPT-4.1 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.6 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Mistral 7B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.