Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.6

Rank #240 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 30.6.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for GPT-4.1 mini.
  • GPT-4.1 mini accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 miniHy3
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index33.644.2
Released2025-04-142026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output33K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.0825
Output $ / M tokens$1.60$0.33
Results tracked4719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Coding13671464
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)23.9%—
Aider Polyglot32.4%—
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode40.4%—
WeirdML37.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
CadEval16%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard50.5%—

Reasoning Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Hard Prompts13491447
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
ARC-AGI-13.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LMCA21.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.01—

Math Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Math13431475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202544.7%—
Omni-MATH49.1%—
MATH Level 587.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—

Knowledge Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Expert13381460
GPQA Diamond65.8%—
SimpleQA Verified12.7%—
MMLU-Pro78.3%—
GPQA (HELM)61.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Vision1181—

Multilingual Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Non-English13181426
LMArena Chinese13291493
LMArena French13581461
LMArena German13511439
LMArena Japanese12901392
LMArena Korean12981395
LMArena Russian13241432
LMArena Spanish13191456

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Instruction Following13331426
IFEval90.4%—

Long Context Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Longer Query13441442
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniHy3
LMArena Text13401439
LMArena Creative Writing13001402
LMArena Multi-Turn13541436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1147—
WildBench83.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 mini lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

Is GPT-4.1 mini or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 mini does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Hy3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper