Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Yi-Large

GPT-3.5-turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#350); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 23.9.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Yi-Large specifications
GPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Noometry Index23.238.1
Released2023-03-012024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window16K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-Large leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%37.7%
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%47.2%
WeirdML3.5%—
LMArena Coding1136—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1108—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.55—
ForecastBench50.4—
WinoGrande81.6%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
LMArena Math1142—
MATH Level 515.9%—
GSM8K57.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
MMLU71.4%79.3%
GPQA Diamond28%—
LMArena Expert1070—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%—
BoolQ87%—
OpenBookQA86%—
TriviaQA85.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
LMArena Non-English1108—
LMArena Chinese1075—
LMArena French1118—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Russian1123—
LMArena Spanish1121—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
LMArena Instruction Following1119—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1121—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboYi-Large
LMArena Text1125—
LMArena Creative Writing1092—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—
LMArena Multi-Turn1117—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Yi-Large?

GPT-3.5-turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#350); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Yi-Large better for coding?

Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 23.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Yi-Large share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper