Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Wizardlm 13b

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 6.3.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Wizardlm 13b specifications
GPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index23.231.4
Released2023-03-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window16K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked4410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 13b leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding11361035
WeirdML3.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts11081018
Chess Puzzles0%—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.55—
ForecastBench50.4—
WinoGrande81.6%—

Math Wizardlm 13b leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math11421017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
MATH Level 515.9%—
GSM8K57.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond28%—
LMArena Expert1070—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%—
BoolQ87%—
MMLU71.4%—
OpenBookQA86%—
TriviaQA85.8%—

Multilingual GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English11081034
LMArena Chinese10751023
LMArena French1118—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Russian1123—
LMArena Spanish1121—

Instruction Following GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following11191048

Long Context GPT-3.5-turbo leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query11211054

Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text11251077
LMArena Creative Writing10921091
LMArena Multi-Turn11171047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 23.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper