Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Phi-3.5-MoE

GPT-3.5-turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#350); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
GPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index23.2—
Released2023-03-012024-08-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window16K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
WeirdML3.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%—
LMArena Coding1136—
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1108—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.55—
ForecastBench50.4—
PIQA—88.6%
WinoGrande81.6%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
GSM8K57.8%88.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
LMArena Math1142—
MATH Level 515.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
BoolQ87%84.6%
GPQA Diamond28%—
LMArena Expert1070—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%—
MMLU71.4%—
OpenBookQA86%—
TriviaQA85.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1108—
LMArena Chinese1075—
LMArena French1118—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Russian1123—
LMArena Spanish1121—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Instruction Following1119—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Longer Query1121—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1125—
LMArena Creative Writing1092—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—
LMArena Multi-Turn1117—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

GPT-3.5-turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#350); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper