Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 9 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 29.7.
  • Step 5 Preview is cheaper at $1 / $2.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Step 5 Preview specifications
GLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)StepFun
Noometry Index43.847.9
Released2026-04-012026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1.02M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Output $ / M tokens$4$2.70
Results tracked1918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev14011564
LMArena Coding14661480
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14431465
CritPt—20.9%

Math Step 5 Preview leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math14411470
ProofBench—42%

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert14521470

Multimodal Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision12641267
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English14201432
LMArena Chinese14881519
LMArena Russian14311436
LMArena Spanish14501439
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14231444

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query14381455

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text14371442
LMArena Creative Writing14161410
LMArena Multi-Turn14321447

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Step 5 Preview share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper