Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Mistral

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 37.0.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Mistral specifications
GLM-5V-TurboMistral
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Mistral AI
Noometry Index43.829.9
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Coding14661162
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14431149

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Math14411180
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Expert14521125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Non-English14201129
LMArena Chinese14881109
LMArena French14441180
LMArena German14231155
LMArena Korean13961032
LMArena Russian14311168
LMArena Spanish14501143
LMArena Japanese—1013

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Instruction Following14231152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Longer Query14381153

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMistral
LMArena Text14371165
LMArena Creative Writing14161158
LMArena Multi-Turn14321147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Mistral?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Mistral better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Mistral share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper