Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Mercury
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 46.2.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1322 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1285 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1239 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1282 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Mercury?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Mercury better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Mercury share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.