Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 48.4.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
GLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index43.837.6
Released2026-04-012024-12-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding14661272
LMArena WebDev1401—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431266

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math14411271

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert14521242

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14201245
LMArena Chinese14881263
LMArena Russian14311227
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14231252

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14381238

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text14371283
LMArena Creative Writing14161269
LMArena Multi-Turn14321275

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper