Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Grok 4.1
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4.1 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 42.1 to 33.7.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1445 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1435 |
Math Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1422 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1417 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Grok 4.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1446 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1438 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1400 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1437 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Grok 4.1?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.