Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs GPT-4

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 10.8.
  • GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)OpenAI
Noometry Index43.829.1
Released2026-04-012023-03-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K8K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$30
Output $ / M tokens$4$60
Results tracked1938

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), GPT-4: 31.6 (#283)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Coding14661254
LMArena WebDev1401—
WeirdML—12.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46%
BigCodeBench Complete—57.2%
HumanEval+—79.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: —, GPT-4: —

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
METR Time Horizons—36.1%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), GPT-4: 17.8 (#289)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Hard Prompts14431241
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—62.7%
LMCA—17.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—75.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.89
ForecastBench—57.8
HellaSwag—95.3%
WinoGrande—87.5%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), GPT-4: 10.8 (#309)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Math14411269
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.1%
MATH Level 5—23%
GSM8K—92%

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), GPT-4: 18.4 (#282)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Expert14521211
GPQA Diamond—35.7%
MMLU—86.4%
TriviaQA—84.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), GPT-4: —

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), GPT-4: 40.6 (#215)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Non-English14201246
LMArena Chinese14881242
LMArena French14441283
LMArena German14231251
LMArena Korean13961184
LMArena Russian14311251
LMArena Spanish14501261
LMArena Japanese—1209

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), GPT-4: 65.3 (#222)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Instruction Following14231241

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), GPT-4: 37.7 (#212)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Longer Query14381244

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), GPT-4: 34.9 (#268)

BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGPT-4
LMArena Text14371263
LMArena Creative Writing14161244
LMArena Multi-Turn14321257
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—752

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than GPT-4?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-4?

GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or GPT-4 better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and GPT-4 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper