Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 34.1.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index46.133.0
Released2026-02-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked4517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14611130
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14521127
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.83—
ForecastBench61—

Math GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14401173
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14541108
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14301094
LMArena Chinese15111108
LMArena French14551110
LMArena German14451101
LMArena Japanese14161042
LMArena Korean1423954
LMArena Russian14361145
LMArena Spanish14541095

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14281113

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14461120
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14461138
LMArena Creative Writing14391107
LMArena Multi-Turn14561088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper