Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

45.9

Rank #59 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.0

Rank #165 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.2 to 50.4.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 specifications
GLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index45.939.0
Released2026-02-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked4511

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#47), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14611320
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 30.9 (#65), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#100), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14511308
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.84—
ForecastBench61—

Math GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.8 (#66), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14401273
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5: 52.2 (#59), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.9 (#57), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14301285
LMArena Chinese15111358
LMArena Russian14361305
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1445—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1421—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.4 (#64), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14271279

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.6 (#58), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14461309
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.2 (#38), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14461311
LMArena Creative Writing14381269
LMArena Multi-Turn14561303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper