Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Grok Build 0.1

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GLM-5 leads 31.1 to 22.7.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $3.20 for GLM-5.
  • Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Grok Build 0.1 specifications
GLM-5Grok Build 0.1
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)xAI
Noometry Index46.136.4
Released2026-02-112026-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$1$1
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$2
Results tracked453

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML48.2%—
LMArena Coding1461—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
GBAEval—2.4%
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles10%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1452—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.83—
ForecastBench61—

Math Not comparable

GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Grok Build 0.1: —

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Grok Build 0.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Grok Build 0.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1430—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1445—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1423—
LMArena Russian1436—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Grok Build 0.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Instruction Following1428—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Grok Build 0.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
CL-bench18.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Grok Build 0.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1446—
LMArena Creative Writing1439—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Grok Build 0.1?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5 or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; GLM-5 lists at $1 and $3.20.

Is GLM-5 or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper