Model comparison

GLM-5.3 vs InternVL2-40B

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#25); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.6

Rank #25 Confirmed

InternVL2-40B Shanghai AI Lab

36.0

Unranked Sparse

Side by side

GLM-5.3 and InternVL2-40B specifications
GLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Shanghai AI Lab
Noometry Index54.636.0
Released2026-08-142024-07-08
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 59.0 (#12), InternVL2-40B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
DeepSWE69%—
FrontierCode40.1%—
LMArena WebDev1623—
FrontierSWE30.2%—
SciCode59%—
WeirdML75.4%—
LMArena Coding1499—
ALE-Bench1,317—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 36.3 (#34), InternVL2-40B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
APEX-Agents56.6%—
Vending-Bench 28,164—

Reasoning Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 45.2 (#42), InternVL2-40B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
NYT Connections (extended)74.2%—
CritPt19.1%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1491—
Mystery Game Puzzles33%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA55.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.56—

Math Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 62.1 (#27), InternVL2-40B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
ProofBench49%—
LMArena Math1493—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#34), InternVL2-40B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1512—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3: —, InternVL2-40B: 33.0

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
Video-MME—61.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 55.9 (#27), InternVL2-40B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
LMArena Non-English1457—
LMArena Chinese1523—
LMArena French1499—
LMArena German1505—
LMArena Japanese1438—
LMArena Korean1478—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 77.8 (#15), InternVL2-40B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
LMArena Instruction Following1481—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 45.5 (#32), InternVL2-40B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
LMArena Longer Query1485—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-5.3: 75.9 (#6), InternVL2-40B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3InternVL2-40B
LMArena Text1473—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1473—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3 better than InternVL2-40B?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#25); InternVL2-40B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3 and InternVL2-40B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and InternVL2-40B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper