Model comparison

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

49.6

Rank #45 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 65.4 to 29.8.

Side by side

GLM-5.3-Flash and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
GLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index49.630.2
Released2026-08-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked3613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding15061090
DeepSWE63.4%—
FrontierCode31.8%—
LMArena WebDev1614—
SciCode51.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%
ALE-Bench303.55—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
APEX-Agents52.8%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14901073
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.9—

Math GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14991117
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.9%—
ProofBench21%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert15121064
GPQA Diamond90.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14621033
LMArena Chinese15291070
LMArena Russian14721045
LMArena French1495—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1420—
LMArena Korean1443—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14801056

Long Context GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14791071

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14711080
LMArena Creative Writing14401046
LMArena Multi-Turn14711053

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3-Flash or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3-Flash and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3-Flash has 36 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper