Model comparison
GLM-5.2 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.2 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.2 leads 55.4 to 32.9.
- GLM-5.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 50.9 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2026-06-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 50 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 50.9 (#37), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1320 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 78.7% | — |
| DeepSWE | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 24.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1604 | — |
| SciCode | 50.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 70.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,047 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5.2: 31.6 (#63), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 37.1% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 31.7% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 8,314 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 42.1 (#46), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1480 | 1308 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 22.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 58.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 62.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 77% | — |
| CritPt | 20.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 93.6% | — |
| LMCA | 45.8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.76 | — |
Math GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 55.4 (#35), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1482 | 1273 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.4% | — |
| ProofBench | 35% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5.2: 57.1 (#36), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 56.0 (#25), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1459 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1467 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1476 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1477 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 77.1 (#32), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1279 |
Long Context GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 45.3 (#43), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5.2 leads
GLM-5.2: 70.7 (#20), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1470 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1468 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1757 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1222 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5.2 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
GLM-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5.2 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
GLM-5.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5.2 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.2 has 50 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.