Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.1 leads 66.9 to 27.1.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
GLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index47.829.7
Released2026-04-072024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14851039
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14721028
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14731089
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1476984
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14471000
LMArena Chinese15151016
LMArena French14741039
LMArena German14651006
LMArena Japanese1434899
LMArena Korean1418856
LMArena Russian14541004
LMArena Spanish14691059

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14511023

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1466996

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14611050
LMArena Creative Writing14531024
LMArena Multi-Turn1472989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper