Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.1 leads 66.9 to 34.1.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index47.833.0
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14851130
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14721127
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14731173
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14761108
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14471094
LMArena Chinese15151108
LMArena French14741110
LMArena German14651101
LMArena Japanese14341042
LMArena Korean1418954
LMArena Russian14541145
LMArena Spanish14691095

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14511113

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14661120

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14611138
LMArena Creative Writing14531107
LMArena Multi-Turn14721088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper