Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Nova Premier 1.0

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 35.8.
  • GLM-5.1 is cheaper at $1.40 / $4.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Nova Premier 1.0 specifications
GLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Amazon
Noometry Index47.838.3
Released2026-04-072025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output131K10K
Input $ / M tokens$1.40$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$4.40$12.50
Results tracked416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
LMArena Coding1485—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
SimpleBench55.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1472—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1476—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1447—
LMArena Chinese1515—
LMArena French1474—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1434—
LMArena Korean1418—
LMArena Russian1454—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1451—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Nova Premier 1.0: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1466—

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Nova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1461—
LMArena Creative Writing1453—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1472—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Nova Premier 1.0?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Nova Premier 1.0?

GLM-5.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper