Model comparison
GLM-5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 47.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 39.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 34% for GLM-5.1 and 60.3% for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.40 / $4.40 for GLM-5.1.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 47.8 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-07 | 2026-08-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.40 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.40 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 41 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1533 |
| SciCode | 43.8% | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | 57.1% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1485 | 1495 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.2% | — |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| ALE-Bench | 887.1 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.2 leads
GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 40.9% | 36.4% |
| ExploitBench | 18.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,634 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads
GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 55.1% | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 77.7% | 79.2% |
| CritPt | 4.6% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1472 | 1486 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.84 | 154.87 |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 69.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
Math GLM-5.1 leads
GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22.2% | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1471 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 36.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 33.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 12.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 34% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1476 | 1480 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5.1: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1305 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads
GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1447 | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1515 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1474 | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | 1454 | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1498 |
| LMArena German | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1418 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1451 | 1461 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1466 | 1475 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads
GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
| Benchmark | GLM-5.1 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1461 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1453 | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1592 | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1472 | 1494 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5.1 better than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 47.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; GLM-5.1 lists at $1.40 and $4.40.
Is GLM-5.1 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (48.7 vs 49.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.