Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.6

Rank #51 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

42.9

Rank #92 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 55.0 to 39.5.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
GLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Moonshot AI
Noometry Index47.642.9
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.5 (#52), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena WebDev15091404
LMArena Coding14861483
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.8 (#106), Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 38.2 (#57), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14721443
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.86—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.0 (#48), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math14721443
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#45), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14771438
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.1: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.2 (#34), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14481406
LMArena Chinese15161450
LMArena French14781403
LMArena German14661413
LMArena Korean14231378
LMArena Russian14531404
LMArena Spanish14671448
LMArena Japanese1436—

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-5.1: 76.5 (#41), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following14511430

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#51), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14671435

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 67.2 (#29), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Kimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text14621420
LMArena Creative Writing14541379
LMArena Multi-Turn14731427
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.6 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.5 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper